Friday Thinking, is a playful reflection of the week's pondering moments.
It is dedicated to illuminating that the next tomorrow won't be like today's yesterday.
It seems the attractor of my minding this week is the prompt about values as they are embodied in moral-cultural contexts. The way a culture can enable values to constelate in a variety of coherent strange attractors.
I enjoy being able to have some sort of accounting of my own processes - the quantitative-self thing (including the cloud of unknowns it lives in). And maybe this is related to the reality that I've never had so much control over how i am able to structure my time as i choose.
Pondering what "taking measures" means?
I continue to feel, that the analytical metrics of my fitbit dashboard suffers large standard deviations, in the 'sensing-analysis' accuracy of the measures the fitbit, can take to sense my self-enaction.
And then i thought about how, there might be an emotional tone in my day. One that i may not be aware of. And this embodimeants of emotional tone, could be key to measurements it algorithm-I-zes of to determine a rating of stress-level.
The floating-fluctuations of anxieties - like currents generating resistances to the mediums-of-flows - frictions and heat -like imflamation.
And then i remembered my moment - of a glimpse into eternity of - almost one second, of enlightment. Later i could only describe this moment as "resistanceless presense". And now i re-cognize that the moment was a blink of the liberty within "awareness of awareness".
I was preparing to participate in a conversation of honest accounts about values. This is a somewhat regular-ish effort amongst a group of elder-ish minds - mostly retired intellectuals and professionals. So I've been pondering moral frameworks and how they frame our relations-in-the-world.
I think current marketing - whatever the product - shoes or news - seems to work best by tailoring the 'choice architectures' of any market in ways the enable tuning a repertoire of 'nudges' for shaping narratives.
Watching the news and it's a-mazing to me. Grasping that every compelling narrative has to exude a coherent-rightness, to anyone for whom the moral-framing is used to navigate viable-enough social existence.
And then trying the question: "Is it possible to determine which moral frameworks lead to which types of results - short-term and long-term." That immediately asks another question: "Whether and/or how - other coherent-rightness moral-framing can exist?"
It could well be that a socially-embodied moral-frame-space operates a core self-reproducing MEME - a bio-cultural attractor.
One night this week my 30 neuro-diverse daughter raised an interesting question related to a narrative she uses and develops as a core to her creative career that help her life flourish. The central character - her alter-ego-hero, must save a comrade trapped in a "Dark crystal" - like world (dcw). The question is whether entering the 'other world' would their bodies have to transform to look familiar to the world's inhabitants.
Immediately i understood a concern that if the rescuers did not transform their bodies into local forms, they would horrify the inhabitants of dcw as 'Alien Invaders'. She loves H.P. Lovecraft and this concern seems so normal in that context of a 'Lovecraftian liminal encounter between dimensions'.
So i let my imagination flow. A sensory-embodied world, with sensory-stimulation protocols enabling response-able, information ecology, as a base condition of re-productive success. The survival of fit ecologies-in-conditions of living. The emergence of cultural learning co-creates a sort-of sensory-shaping field. A meta-protective protocol.
And so what are the choices of an invador's - species-re-productive survival. The challenge should be felt-as-stress by the challenging-invader. When is that stress 'redeemed'? And what protective mimetic-field is needed to structure the social-protocols of agencies for collective response-abilities for evolving survive-ability.
Sensoriums of living systems would be shaped to evolve that can organize viable enough mapping protocols, that in turn enable viable interactions-en-vironments. So the question of how aliens become re-cognized and re-cognize first contact encounters and how they evolve further environments. How do cultural memetic environments perceive evolution enaction?
drifting -
through the cloud -
of un-knowing -
moral frameworks -
socially-constructed -
sensorial-stimulations -
organ-eyezed -
entangled-empirical -
sense-making-worlds -
proto-calls -
fore -
aliens-in-a-strange-land -
[#micropoem](https://twitter.com/hashtag/micropoem?src=hashtag_click)
Of course an elemental attractor to pondering moral-frameworks is the progressive-conservative, left-right, social-private, collective-individual polarities of moral-political-belief spectrums. And alwasy and everywhere is righteousness.
The challenge of an open mind is finding a foundation for confindence in the right-righteousnees of our observation-and-judgements.
Political Moral Framing
I wondered about the vigilant and eternal quest of - re-searching for the arc of evolving democracy. Shouldn't the very conception of a democracy inevitably shapes a flourishing of a wealth of diversity. Perhaps increasing growth in the wealth of diversities - each-and-all response-able to evolving and entangled conditions - can provide some useful measures of social-cultural civilizational health.
Pondering Moral Attractors
I was looking the different constelations of 5 moral values deemed universal (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, purity) that arise when people are asked to rate then. The easiest constelations to imagine are the very liberal vs the very conservative.
These two constilations also correlate with Democracy vs Patriarchy and Nuturant Parent vs Strict Father Family Models.
According to research
![[Pasted image 20230318001014.png]]
Liberal Democracy weighs - fairness-care as co-equals - with a vital importance. This makes sense, as democracies consider all equal (at least before the law) and thus invites ever developing diversities - welcome.
Conservative governance weighs loyalty-purity-authority - as co-equals - with vital importance within a tight 'center-mass' of reduced importance of care/harm and fairness.
I can't seem to help myself from always drifting into complexity. Thinking of the bio-cultural processes of a metabolic-allostasis or memetic value constelations. The social process of enact-meants of ideological re-production. How the value-relation algorithms have to have a tune-able capacity (like turning knobs to increase-decrease relational statuses) for each value spectrum. And that's exactly what the chart seems to identify - like different cultural value-strange-attractors. Like chords-with-feedback-afford-dancing - melodies.
This episode of Friday Thinking ends with a wonderful ereka-moment i experienced watching Poker Face with/by Natasha Lyonne - Season 1, Episode 8. In the first episode I thought that Natasha was channeling Peter Falk in his television role as "Columbo" - a low-key rumpled classic 'gumshoe' dectective.
In episode 8 with a brilliant performance of Nick Nolte (being an old Nick Nolte with a fidelity to honesty that only he can convey) illuminated an archetypal - god-like role - of the unplacable, unremiting - confessor. Damming those who don't take the opportunity she offers to embrace the honest accounting of their deeds.
literally -
holy-shit -
poker-face -
s1e8 -
'columbo-the-confessor -
of accounts' -
brilliance -
even at its most -
obvious -
interio-or-ogations -
end of transmission
each night -
i play -
my small wind -
chamber -
of one note -
another song -
of multi-dimensional -
diverse-ariety -
Last pondering thought.
Pondering my twitter stream. My customized stream - but for who, is it customized?
And the ghost of my feeling - once ago - of how I felt connected with real people. There was an easy to use stream that actually let me sample and shape enough to stay current with network-communities. Now - it just seems random without easy ways to shape the view of the stream.
i remember feeling like it was my own sort of personal newspaper. And now Twitter is the future of news. Will it continue to shape us into marketing incanted rational-zombies - dreaming of life-blood.
Then again - there is too much to know - and moore over - there is a moore-to-different phase-transition liminal space - what is on the other side of this phase transition.
Whatever happens we are all anticipating better personal instrument panels for sampling and shaping streams for our entanglemeants and our own stream of experiencing and scheduling of attentions.
mhm
