Friday Thinking, is a playful reflection of the week's pondering moments.
It is dedicated to illuminating that the next tomorrow won't be like today's yesterday.
Of course, there is no 'neutral politics' or economics or even science. Religion has been how we enculture a faith in values. Politics is how we align our power among ourselves with our cultural values. Economics is how we rationalize the credit-and-debt of our interdependencies in relations to our valuing of values. Science is how we search for and develop the reliability of what we value.
The question of the - __re-conciling the accounts__. I find fascination in looking at the moral and religious palettes embodied in basics of the accounting tems in economics. The invisible hand of moral religiousness of economics. The sacredness of dedemption of our obligations in our socie-ties.
I am reading 'The Ministry of the Future', just past when Frank dies. In hospice. A slow fading, slide out. Podering this membrane moment of evaporation. I feel there can be joy in the simple - of presencing. Awaring and awaring awareness - without judgment.
And then there is Adience. Audience-share. A shadow of the atomistic - isolated -self-ish - individual. The mutualism of performer-audience measures.
The foundation of a democracy is more than the vote. And the vote is not for leaders, maybe that's even a contradiction - do followers vote for leaders?
Rather, the vote is to appoint representatives, with a duty to formulate the laws we want. And the stewarding of the public institutions that provide for our public flourishing. It is far beyond regulating the 'private-sector-market'. It is the formulation of the rules for enacting our collective will - the general will. Our representatives at all levels are the scribes for encoding laws of self-governance - for public good. Not to be high-priests of the invisible hand of private goods.
Institutions are the organs of the demos - the polis - the political-economy - the social-moral-economy. The core of a political-economy lives through the systems of accounting for the value of our values. The time-space-matter constraints of valueing. The systems of accounting - assets and liability - credit and debts.
Currency isn't a free floating commodity. It is an institution of accounting credit-ability - credit-worthyness - credit-redemption from obligations. And a sense of liberty. And for what? From what? The shadow of liberty, is it enslavement? Or is it the absent of relationship and connectedness.
For a credit to have value, social relationships have to be trust-worthy. Social-relations have to be able to enact credit-able means of redemption.
Could one read Adam Smith as imagining a most plausible enactment of democracy, in the context of monarch-empires. Shifting toward a self-organizing commons, enacted by moral beings, for moral beings.
Capitalism is a game of compound network-effects - the more x you have, the easier it is to get more x, till you own the house - in a ponzi-way.
And a subjectivity-based agency, whether in the context of a 'natural' nature or in the context of a technology optisms, have the same shadow. It is the looming - liminal-finality of a dissolution of self. This imbues the dark ecology of mind.
and subjectivity-based -
agency -
framed-in -
polarity of -
nature-vs-technology -
have the same shadow -
the looming -
liminal-finality of a -
dissolution of self -
the dark ecology of mind -
[#micropoem](https://twitter.com/hashtag/micropoem?src=hashtag_click)
but capitalism -
is a game -
of compound -
network-effects -
the more x you have -
the easier it is to get more x -
till you own the house -
in a ponzi-way -
[#micropoem](https://twitter.com/hashtag/micropoem?src=hashtag_click)
From pondering a Smithian strategy aiming to shift a value-attractor for enacting an evolving of collective intelligence. The emergent constraint, that enables the regulation of ongoing living - is an anticipatory response-able shaping of allostasis. A quorum-sensing-stimulation, into being.
A focus on a self-organizing market was one, plausibe enactmeant, toward a more democratic govern-mentality. A pre-Hegelian evolution of history.
I don't really know, what i'll need - in order to find the pattern that connects. Which means that i don't know what belief constellations, will change what i know, that ain't so.
Believing' is entangled with 'knowing' - a sort of credit-debt mutualism. This is a philosophical afford-dancing -with allostatic - for-see-ables - the sensing-stimulating ouburus.
